A Proposal to Fine News Agencies That Don't Produce News
I've been frustrated by Fox News Corp and their spin since the last World Trade Center rebar fell from the New York sky eight years ago (on my birthday, no less). After 9/11, the Bush Machine shifted into overdrive, Fox News (a.k.a. Fixed News, Fox Noise, Faux News, and my favorite, Cluster Fox) began an eight year stench as the first news corporation acting as directly as an echo chamber for the White House Briefing Room. While the towers' dust was still settling and people were spinning their heads wondering what the hell just happened, Fox News set sail for uncharted waters, namely suggestive partisan journalism. And sadly most major news organizations at the time followed their lead. Maybe it was out of fear of piercing the brief unanimity we all felt during the aftermath of 9/11. Hell, even some of my closest friends, who couldn't normally stomach the sight of our Monkey-President Bush, wouldn't hear of me speaking a single word in opposition to G.W., even as we stumbled toward an unrelated war.
Bias in journalism is not exactly new, so saying Fox entered "uncharted waters" is an exaggeration. But as long as I've been paying attention to the news in my lifetime, I've never seen such spin directed toward forwarding a President's agenda. Or thwarting it, as their mission has now become. (Funny how it was un-American to speak against the President while their Republican Christian Ideologue was at the helm, but Barack Hussein Obama is somehow fair game.)
My beef with Fox News since Barack Obama was elected is this: the Fox right-wing spin machine, that has the audacity to claim it is "fair and balanced" (!), has switched from greatly spinning news to the right to flat-out lying about the news. There's a term for what they're pulling off (I can't remember what it is off-hand), but it involves a closed-loop news feedback of sorts.
Here's how it works:
Someone at Fox "News" like Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, or one of those less-than-friendly scumbags on "Fox and Friends" (Gretchen Carlson, Steve "Doothy" Doocy, or Brian "Oh Just Kill Me" Kilmeade) makes an editorial comment about what people are supposedly talking about. Of course since none of these idiots mentioned are self-proclaimed journalists (they call themselves "entertainers" as a way of getting away with such ridiculously unsubstantiated comments), everything they say, by definition, is an editorial comment. But I'm getting off point...
So one of these stroke-offs make some crazy comment about what they claim "people are talking about". Sometimes these comments are part of some actual fringy stupidness that's already loose on the public, like "Barack Obama doesn't have a birth certificate". But often times than not they try to stir up their Republican brethren by contradicting anything the President is doing with something outrageous that is totally made up.
In turn, people who watch Fox News as their only source of news (always Republican fundamentalists, and often people who seemingly can't decipher editorial comment from fact and can't think for themselves) begin to get worked up about these newfound "facts". Then to close the loop, Fox News "journalists" conveniently pick up the story as something people are genuinely concerned about, which is only true in that people have heard it on their news station earlier from one of those aforementioned idiots or someone else who echoes Fox garbage and plants it on their right-wing blogs, etc.
You see, before Fox initially planted the story, it didn't exist. But now the people who watch this "news channel" farce may really be concerned. After all, the news told them it was true.
So while the thinkers among us are trying to debate the facts of healthcare reform, a bunch of Fox News-watching sheep herd up behind us and try to lynch us for it, all because they heard Obama wants to kill the elderly or some such fucking craziness.
Recently, there was an NBC/WSJ poll in which they found that the people who were gravely and stupidly misinformed about the facts of healthcare all had one thing in common: They all watched Fox News as their single source for news.
I've fucking had it with this bullshit.
I propose that the FCC start issuing large fines to supposed "news" organizations like Fox News who can't substantiate their so-called facts. They must provide This would promote good ol' real, fact-checking journalism, while ousting the blatant lies sold as news.
Furthermore, I also propose that penalties are given to organizations who lay a claim to being a "news station" without having either 100% actual, fact-based journalism OR issuing a disclaimer before shows like Glenn Beck or Bill O'reilly saying that these shows are for entertainment purposes only and are not to be confused with actual news.
Otherwise this self-fulfilling prophesying of fake news will never be tamed. And we'll be left to having two sets of discussions every time we want to get anything accomplished: one based in reality and actual facts, and one based on the stoked fears of people who have been lied to by their trusted news organizations.
Side note: I've personally had to deal with clinically insane people before, and it's absolutely impossible to get anywhere with them. They have their own reality, and they truly believe it to be true, so no matter what you say, you can't win. It's the most aggravating thing in the world. There are real similarities to my past brush in dealing with the insane and talking to the Republican base about healthcare. It's made all the more aggravating by the fact that these are not insane people. These are sane people who made the mistake of believing something other than fact. Worse yet, these believers just know what they've been is the truth and think us to be the ones who are either lying or misinformed. In short, arguing about reality with Republicans is far more aggravating than arguing with insane people. At least insane people are clinically insane.


